Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Default Window Geometry
- From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico nuclecu unam mx>
- To: gleef capital net
- CC: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Default Window Geometry
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:09:46 -0400
> The way I see it, it might and it might not. Looking at <gdk/gdk.h>, I
> see two functions: gdk_screen_width() and gdk_screen_height(). My
> question is, if you have a desktop size different than the screen size,
> which number do this functions give?
These use DisplayWidth() and DisplayHeight(), provided by Xlib. They
return the size in pixels of the specified screen.
> The way I see it, the concepts required for a GNOME-compliant application
> are completely different than for a GNOME-compliant window manager. While
> it might be useful to include the current GNOME-wm compliance information
> in the Style Guide, those discussions have gone on elsewhere, and I don't
> see how we should have much to add.
>
> Remember, anything that we require of window managers should be agreed on
> by not only GNOME developers, but the developers of the GNOME-compliant
> window managers (i.e. IceWM, Enlightenment, SCWM and BlackBox, more if
> there are more).
A while ago on gnome-list there was quite a big discussion about what a
GNOME-compliant window manager should have. It seems that about the
only things we can specify for compliancy are window manager hints and
session management. Please look at the gnome-list archives for that
information.
Federico
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]