A few thoughts on Compliancy Levels..
- From: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- To: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: A few thoughts on Compliancy Levels..
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:00:30 -0700 (MST)
Here's a brief preview of how the UISG will address the issue of
Compliancy Levels, before the flesh revision goes public on Saturday:
o Levels 1 thru 5 are ALL "Gnome Compliant". Applications which
dont adhere to even the most basic guidelines given in Level 5
are said to be "Non-Compliant".
o The levels themselves are set up with simple criteria that must be
met in order to attain that level. For example, Level 5 is the bare
minimum which must be met, in order for an app to call itself
"Gnome Compliant"..Level 4, the step above it, encompasses everything
in Level 5, plus a little more..And the level above THAT, Level 3,
encompasses everything in 4,plus a little more. Nothing too rough.
o Judgement for Compliance is done through the Compliancy Checklists
shown on the UISG webpage. If you can answer Yes to all of the items,
pat yourself on the back -- Your app is Gnome Level (?) Compliant.
o The Compliancy Levels under the UISG are set up in such a way as to
encourage developers to constantly reach for stricter and stricter
compliance, with Level 1 being the ultimate attainable goal. Reaching
Level 1 has nothing to do with "building in extra features", or
"adding exotic options".. It merely means that this application
more strictly adheres to the Style Guide reccomendations & mandates
than a lower level app does. A Gnome app is STILL "compliant",
even though it is loosely compliant at something like Level 5.
I guess you coul say that a Level 1 App is "more compliant", and a
Level 5 app is "less compliant" , but I really dont like to think
of it that way. Theyre ALL compliant -- Just some more strictly
adhere to the guide than others, and are ranked by level accordingly.
o The Compliancy Levels are are constructed in such a fashion so as to
allow modifications of the level criteria, without breaking
consistancy. No (major) revisions would need to be performed on the
Compliancy Level definitions for at least another 4-5 years. The
entire document (UISG V2.0) is designed this way. A nice, built-in
measure against obsolescence.
More later,
Bowie
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bowie J. Poag bjp@primenet.com http://www.nubox.dyn.ml.org |
| Sand and grit in a concrete base. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]