Re: irc summary

[Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>]

Preben Randhol <randhol@dusken4.samfundet.ntnu.no> wrote:
> | 1: Microsoft did not cheat to get C2.
> |    C2 is simply that weak.
> |    In other words: C2 does not say much about security
> 
> Yes they did. Only NT 3.5 is C2 not NT 4.0

precisely (to end this off-topic thread) it's a specific build of 3.5 on a
specific hardware, without network connection and local user contextes. (aka
useless)

the full details can be found somewhere on the web. if someone exists, I'll
go and hunt 'em down.


-- 
The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.