Re: irc summary

[Stephan Pfab <pfab thales sai mathematik uni-ulm de>]

"Dan Kaminsky" <effugas@best.com> wrote:
>OK, OFFICIALLY, does *ANYBODY AT ALL* think it's a good idea to have C2 be
>an abbreviation for Complaince Level 2 for GNOME when in the NT world C2 is
>a rating that Microsoft cheated to get for itself?

>Are you guys SURE we should associate ourselves with a cheated rating,
>especially considering Linux itself will eventually get rated C2 as a whole,
>for *real*?


1: Microsoft did not cheat to get C2.
   C2 is simply that weak.
   In other words: C2 does not say much about security

2: C2 is not NT specific

3: What do you prefere in our context ?

   Comp2?

Stephan