Re: Two-words and one-words GUI elements
- From: Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt myrealbox com>
- To: gnome-doc-list Documentation <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Two-words and one-words GUI elements
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:24:01 +0100
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:21 PM, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
...
Il giorno mer, 23/04/2008 alle 12.59 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
There are a number of -bar and -box terms where there's
disagreement on whether they should be one word or two.
...
Well, as your report suggests, for UI elements we use mostly the
"joint" form. I'd like much more the two-words version, though. I find
that much clearer to read and understand -- more descriptive and less
looking like a geeky invention.
Compound words sometimes become single words over time. I think this
happens at different speeds for different terms, depending on how
common they are (with more common terms having greater pressure to
become shorter), which is why none of us seem to be particularly
consistent in our opinions.
Using the one-word form, while most other people don't, looks dorkish:
I think this is the case for "statusbar", "menubar", "titlebar", and
"fullscreen".
Conversely, persisting in using the two-word form, after most people
have switched to the one-word form, looks out of date: I think this is
the case for "check box".
...
I'd like to see "radio button" really go away, far away, never to turn
back. It's way better using the term "option" and that's all; if you
need to refer to some of these options, you just call them a "group of
options", and you ask the user to "choose one of the following
options".
If he reads of "choose your sex with the right radio button, selecting
Male or Female" he'd panic, but "choose your sex between Male and
Female selecting the right option" is enough for anyone to understand.
The exact wording of the last sentence can be further improved, of
course.
...
This is a really good point, and not just for radio buttons. Earlier I
recommended using the term "window" for all windows, regardless of
type. I recommend a similar approach here for controls: wherever
possible, avoid referring to them by type.
Usually you can refer to controls solely by label, and this is shorter
too. For example:
* Instead of "Click the 'OK' button", say "Click 'OK'".
* Instead of "Ensure that the 'Show canvas border' checkbox is
checked', say "Ensure that 'Show canvas border' is selected".
Where you absolutely must refer to a control by type, I suggest using
"check/uncheck the ... box" for checkboxes and "click the ... button"
for radio buttons.
(Again, none of this applies to programs like Glade that are
specifically about creating graphical interfaces.)
Cheers
--
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]