Re: gcalctool Updated screenshots

[Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>]

On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 08:24 -0700, Rich Burridge wrote:
> Hi Don,
> > It was brought to my attention on IRC that the gcalctool manual was
> > missing a screenshot (gcalctool_advanced_window.png).
> >
> > Since all the screenshots in the manual are from different themes, I
> > spent a few minutes recreating them all using the default Clarius^W
> > Clearlooks theme. (I won't attach them here.  Look at the current ones
> > and imagine them in Clearlooks).
> >
> > I was wondering whether the GDP looked after the gcalctool manual and
> > whether its okay to commit these changes (before the 2.16 deadline)?
> >
> > Any objections?  Anyone know if the GDP looks after the manual?
> >   
> 
> As far as I know, nobody is working on gcalctool documentation since
> Sun RIF'ed the Sun documentation team that was doing this.
> 
> It's not just the screenshot that's out of date. It's a boatload of 
> other things
> too. I've been keeping track of them. See bug #309210 for all the details.
> 
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309210
> 
> If you want to make changes, I'd be over the moon.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=gcalctool

The docs component for gcalctool still has Breda as
the default assignee and QA contact.  If you would
like the GDP to assume maintainership, then we would
like the default assignee to be the alias: 

  gnome-user-docs-maint gnome bugs

The default QA contact can be anything you like.
Many maintainers set the QA contact to themselves
or their product's -maint alias so they can track
documentation bugs easily.

Anybody listed as a developer of gcalctool can
change the components here:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/editcomponents.cgi?product=gcalctool

Unfortunately, it looks like nobody is listed as
a gcalctool developer in bugzilla.  You should
email bugmaster gnome org and ask to be added as
a developer.

--
Shaun