Re: Summary of module branches for GNOME 2.2

[Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>]

Hi Breda.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:01:41PM +0000, Breda McColgan wrote:
> does a "GNOME 2.0" branch exist? If so, how should we specify it:
>  -r 2
>  -r 2.0
> 
> If a bug is logged against a GNOME 2.0 document, (or if a bug logged
> against a later version also applies to the GNOME 2.0 version of the
> document), where should we put the updated document for GNOME 2.0?

Here's the (mostly, probably) complete list for GNOME 2.0:

bonobo-activation: -r gnome-2-0
bug-buddy: -r gnome-2-0
eel: -r gnome-2-0
eog: -r gnome-2-0
gail: -r gnome-2-0
gconf-editor: -r gnome-2-0
gconf: -r gconf-1-2
gedit: -r gnome-2-0
glade: -r glade-gnome2-branch
glib: -r glib-2-0
gnome-applets: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-common: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-control-center: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-desktop: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-games: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-panel: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-session: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-terminal: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-utils: -r gnome-2-0
gnome-vfs: -r gnome-2-0
gtkhtml2: -r gnome-2-0
gtk+: -r gtk-2-0
libgnomecanvas: -r gnome-2-0
libgnomeprint: -r gnome-2-0
libgnomeprintui: -r gnome-2-0
libgnome: -r gnome-2-0
libgnomeui: -r gnome-2-0
libgtop: -r libgtop-GNOME-2-0-port
libwnck: -r gnome-2-0
linc: -r gnome-2-0
nautilus: -r gnome-2-0
ORBit2: -r gnome-2-0
pango: -r pango-1-0
sawfish: -r gnome-2
yelp: -r gnome-2-0

So it's pretty much as Sander indicated in another mail (-r gnome-2-0),
except for glade, gtk+, libgtop and sawfish.

Cheers,
Malcolm

-- 
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.