Re: Summary of module branches for GNOME 2.2

[Breda McColgan <breda mccolgan sun com>]

Hi Malcolm and Greg,

does a "GNOME 2.0" branch exist? If so, how should we specify it:
 -r 2
 -r 2.0

If a bug is logged against a GNOME 2.0 document, (or if a bug logged
against a later version also applies to the GNOME 2.0 version of the
document), where should we put the updated document for GNOME 2.0?


Thanks,
Breda.






Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> 
> John Fleck has been incrementally posting any mail that announces module
> branches. However, it sometimes becomes a bit hard to track all of
> these.
> 
> With GNOME 2.2 just around the corner, the branches have more or less
> stabilised now, so here is a list of all the modules with branches
> relevant to the 2.2 release. This will be useful for bug fixing user
> documentation, since the fixes will also need to go in on these
> branches (as well as the main trunk down the track).
> 
> Branch is called 'gnome-2-2'
> ----------------------------
> atk
> gail
> gconf
> gedit
> gnome-applets
> gnome-games
> gnome-panel
> gnome-terminal
> gnome-utils
> libgnomeprint
> libgnomeprintui
> libwnck
> linc
> metacity
> ORBit2
> 
> Branch has some other name
> ---------------------------
> glade: glade-gnome2-branch
> libgtop: libgtop-GNOME-2-0-port
> sawfish: gnome-2
> 
> Outside GNOME CVS
> ------------------
> gstreamer: BRANCH-GSTREAMER-0_6 (needed for gnome-media)
> 
> Of course, not all of these are directly relevant to user documentation,
> but somebody might want to help out the GStreamer guys or something
> (although their docs are pretty good from a developer standpoint).
> 
> Cheers,
> Malcolm
> 
> --
> "Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list