Re: Remove glossary from status page?

[Danilo Segan <dsegan gmx net>]

четвртак, 21. август 2003. 15:18:56 CEST — Damien Donlon написа:
> We are getting ready to commit our latest translations to a separate 
> module called sun-l10n. Would it be of any benefit if we moved them 
> to there? I agree with Christian that they should not be simply 
> deleted. They are used for reference by our translation people. Which 
> "status pages" is Abel referring to above? They aren't being picked 
> up for inclusion in the translation statistics are they?! :o)

Yes, they're showed in translation statistics.

And as Christian already mentioned, the status pages are the most 
visible of all for the translators, and if something's not in there, 
it's highly likely that it goes untranslated by many teams.

Removing glossary from the "status pages" would be detrimenal to the 
task -- many will miss it, and therefore, you wouldn't have what to 
base a new translation on (like, Serbian ;-).

So, if you do care about translations, it should better stay in the 
status pages.


And the only reason I can see for dropping them is to improve 
"standings" -- but alas, that's not a reason good enough. And btw, 
glossary is not included in the core Gnome desktop, so there's nothing 
in Gnome that makes them translate that (even if they want a "100%" 
translated Gnome).


Cheers,
Danilo