Re: Where should these docs go?

[John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>]

On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 20:51, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:43:00PM -0600, John Fleck wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 10:01, hobbit aloss ukuu org uk wrote:
> [...]
> > > I'm inclined to stuff 'em in gnome-docu/ but if people have
> > > thoughts on better places, now is a very good time to say.
> > 
> > That sounds like a good location to me. It's rather of a junk pile in
> > there right now, though, and the cleanest thing might be an entirely new
> > subdirectory: gnome-docu/gnome2-global-docs or some such. Then each
> > could get its own subdirectory, to whit:
> > 
> > gnome-docu/gnome2-global-docs/g2portability/C/g2portability.xml or some
> > such.
> 
> It's possible I have been reading too much usability-related mail or
> something, but the redundancy here is striking. If the subdirectory is
> gnome2-global-docs, then we don't need to prefix everything else with
> 'g2', right? :-)

Oh, yes, by all means, brevity soul of wit and all.

> 
> I do agree with at least putting all this stuff in a subdirectory,
> though, since that will also make it easier to roll a developer-docs
> package, etc, and those of us who only want the TelsaDocs ..er ...
> gnome2-global-docs module can just pull the relevant subdirectory,
> rather than the whole ball of wax.
> 

Gee, and I was thinking of MalcolmDocs. :-)

-- 
John Fleck
jfleck inkstain net (h) jfleck abqjournal com (w)
http://www.inkstain.net http://www.abqjournal.com

"Sometimes, a diner is all about the mac and cheese." 
  - Zippy the Pinhead