RE: More (sigh) questions: applet docs
- From: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc cu-portland edu>
- To: "'David C. Mason'" <dcm redhat com>, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Cc: Telsa Gwynne <hobbit aloss ukuu org uk>
- Subject: RE: More (sigh) questions: applet docs
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:09:37 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David C. Mason [mailto:dcm@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 9:02 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc
> Cc: Telsa Gwynne; gnome-doc-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: More (sigh) questions: applet docs
>
>
> Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@cu-portland.edu> writes:
>
>
> > > And turn all my sect1s into sect2s and 2s into 3s and so
> on, or what?
> >
> > Just turn them into <section>s. This gets you around the
> whole problem
> > of knowing which tags, since <section> can be nested pretty much
> > ad-infinitum. Not sure about the rest of it, but I'd sure
> like to know.
> > Greg
>
>
> Using the generic <section> can be a messy proposition when it
> comes time for us to generate a TOC in something like the help
> browser. Personally I think we should stay away from using them
> altogether.
I don't follow. What are you doing to generate the TOC that isn't
smart enough to understand recursion? Maybe that tool just needs
somebody to hack on it.
Greg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOJHNJ5LW/u8jW+lnEQIOJgCeK1AUd5ABNRh2hK+LHQRqeROb8QYAoMLr
8fGI4CcOgyvOO4LF8MQDk5hb
=utrI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]