Re: More (sigh) questions: applet docs

["David C. Mason" <dcm redhat com>]

Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc@cu-portland.edu> writes:


> > Using the generic <section> can be a messy proposition when it
> > comes time for us to generate a TOC in something like the help
> > browser. Personally I think we should stay away from using them
> > altogether.  
> 
> I don't follow.  What are you doing to generate the TOC that isn't
> smart enough to understand recursion?  Maybe that tool just needs
> somebody to hack on it.
> 	Greg

The problem is that we want to define the format for our various
section types in our dsssls - if we use <section>s we aren't able to do
as good a job at that task.

As I just told telsa on irc - we need a doc that is a gnome applets
doc where people can just submit <sect2>s or whatever and it all
builds as a book. - that way the author of an applet doesn't need to
worry about it - the maintainer does. Thats how it is in the users
guide now - but since that will be split up - we could use a gnome
applets doc maintainer.


Dave

-- 

          David Mason
        Red Hat AD Labs

        dcm@redhat.com