Re: Anjuta2 renaming status

[jeroen <jeroen xs4all nl>]

Hi John,

On 25 Jul 2003, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:

> Well I wrote a quick python utility to help in the renaming and also
> have something to show the small python learning group I am part of.
> Imagine my supprise when the newly renamed scaffold compiled and
> installed on the first try.  Python rocks.  There is still a bit more to
> do before I feel like diffing and submitting it.  One problem that pops
> up is one of the external plugins (too tired to check which one right
> now) uses one function from anjuta2.  Either this function should be put
> into gbf or not used at all.  I also have to make sure I don't munge up
> the CVS directories since the module name is still anjuta.  I have code
> in my python script to ignore some files and directories but for some
> reason it does not work.  If I can work out these things I can have a
> patch against CVS by tomorow.  If not then by the end of the weekend.

Cool stuff! Could you post the python script to the list? I'm interested
how it works as well :)

> I belive changing the CVS module would be as easy as the gnome CVS
> maintainer renaming the directory.  So the big question is are we set on
> scaffold as the name.  As another user has brought up the name Scaffold
> does not stroke the imagination like Anjuta does.  I personaly like
> Scaffold but since the name change was so easy I see no reason not to
> open it up again to other suggestions.

I don't think we can just rename the module (not sure though). I think we
need to create a new module from scratch. I'll try and contact a cvs admin
tonight/this weekend to find out how this is supposed to work.

> It is ultimatly up to you Jeroen.

I've pretty much chosen the Scaffold name and i don't see any reasons why
we shouldn't use that.

Jeroen