Re: [gnome-db] libgda: using g_param_spec_object() instead of g_param_spec_pointer()

["Vivien Malerba" <vmalerba gmail com>]

On 12/22/06, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 15:02 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> > On 12/15/06, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> > > I just committed a large but repetitive patch (attached) to make libgda
> > > use specific types for its properties. I've tested it with libgnomedb
> > > test-dynwidgets test, and it seems to be OK.
> >
> > Sorry for taking so long to accept your mail...
> >
> > I've just added a few corrections because the g_object_get() function
> > now gives a reference to the callers.
>
> Thanks. Sorry for missing that.

No problem...

> And I think that the unused "prop" properties should probably be
> deleted.

Yes.

> We'll need to do the same thing for libgnomedb, I think.

That'd be good!

> I'm also hoping that you find time to add the database_name parameter to
> prepare_create_database(), or tell me how to do it. It's blocking me
> from porting Glom to libgda 3.0.

It's in CVS now (you'll see it's very simple...)

Cheers,

Vivien