Re: [gnome-db] libgda: using g_param_spec_object() instead of g_param_spec_pointer()

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 15:02 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> > I just committed a large but repetitive patch (attached) to make libgda
> > use specific types for its properties. I've tested it with libgnomedb
> > test-dynwidgets test, and it seems to be OK.
> 
> Sorry for taking so long to accept your mail...
> 
> I've just added a few corrections because the g_object_get() function
> now gives a reference to the callers.

Thanks. Sorry for missing that.

And I think that the unused "prop" properties should probably be
deleted.

We'll need to do the same thing for libgnomedb, I think.

I'm also hoping that you find time to add the database_name parameter to
prepare_create_database(), or tell me how to do it. It's blocking me
from porting Glom to libgda 3.0.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com