Re: [gnome-db] [mergeant] Status ?



> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 15:27 +0100, Vivien wrote:
>> >
>>
>> I agree with having only one UI library in the future, it's going to be
>> easier for all the developpers.
>>
>> Libgnomedb is quite stable and libmergeant is not yet stable (still some
>> bugs and the API is still changing often), so I think it's better if we
>> wait for a rather stable version of libmergeant before we merge the two
>> libraries.
>>
> ok, let's wait then for post mergeant-1.0 to do it.

Or at least wait to have a stable libmergeant version, which should occur
before mergeant.

>
>> I'm at the moment writing a complete application with libmergeant which
>> allows me to fast-debug it and make it more useable.
>>
> what kind of app is that? Is it similar to mergeant? I ask because
> mergeant HEAD needs a lot of love, and myself haven't been able to
> dedicate any time at all to it.

No, it's a dedicated application to manage some data we have at work; and
it's built using libmergeant and glade.

>
> Could you also please commit the stuff you've got for libmergeant you
> mentioned in your other mail? Also, would you have a little time to at
> least start the basics in mergeant HEAD and then let other people
> continue with the development? I stopped working on it, apart from
> because of lack of time, because I had to have a deep look at
> libmergeant to continue, and time didn't allow me to do that, so if we
> could have a bit of help from you in starting the development in HEAD, I
> guess that would be great.

Yes, I'll do this ASAP, in the mergeant's HEAD module, and I'll also put
the doc there. This will probably be next week...

I'll also spend a bit of time on the new mergeant to bootstrap it so it's
easier for other people to start working on it.

I'd also like to write a very simple application with libmergeant to show
the basic ideas and how to use it; a kind of lear example.

Cheers,

Vivien



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]