RE: [gnome-db] Name proposal/contest for gnome-db/gASQL
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Malerba_Vivien stna dgac fr
- Cc: fmartins hetnet nl, GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: [gnome-db] Name proposal/contest for gnome-db/gASQL
- Date: 18 Jun 2002 16:36:57 +0200
>
> > > I agree that we need a kind of features and TODO lists at least for
> > > Egnima. I can propose something if you want.
> > >
> > I've been using bugzilla for that, and I think that's what we should be
> > using, since it helps a lot when keeping track of who is working on what
> > and what else is missing. So far, the list of open bugs for
> > libgda/libgnomedb/gnome-db/gASQL is at:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=gASQL&product=gnome-db&product=libgda&product=libgnomedb&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=substring&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=substring&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&op_sys_details=&op_sys_details_type=substring&version_details=&version_details_type=substring&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&form_name=query
> >
> > so, if nobody has nothing against it, just let's use bugzilla. As soon
> > as we finish the port, I'll create a product for egnima. Or, even
> > better, I could create it now. For that, I'd just need to know in which
> > components (parts) are we splitting out egnima. So, vivien, please tell
> > me which components you want, and I'll create them, so that you can
> > enter TODO tasks into bugzilla and have people take them when they want
> > to work on something.
>
> Yes, that's better using bugzilla.
>
> About Egnima's components, I don't have a precise idea except to have
> components for the documentation, packages, translations and general
> code. I have no idea if we should split further the code into other sub
> components.
>
well, it should be separated into features, more or less, so, for
instance, we could have:
queries
forms
documentation
packages
translations
SQL editor
...
although I don't know if it's worthy having too many components. Any
comments anyone?
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]