RE: [gnome-db] Name proposal/contest for gnome-db/gASQL

> > > I agree that we need a kind of features and TODO lists at least for
> > > Egnima. I can propose something if you want.
> > > 
> > I've been using bugzilla for that, and I think that's what we should be
> > using, since it helps a lot when keeping track of who is working on what
> > and what else is missing. So far, the list of open bugs for
> > libgda/libgnomedb/gnome-db/gASQL is at:
> > 
> >
> > 
> > so, if nobody has nothing against it, just let's use bugzilla. As soon
> > as we finish the port, I'll create a product for egnima. Or, even
> > better, I could create it now. For that, I'd just need to know in which
> > components (parts) are we splitting out egnima. So, vivien, please tell
> > me which components you want, and I'll create them, so that you can
> > enter TODO tasks into bugzilla and have people take them when they want
> > to work on something.
> Yes, that's better using bugzilla.
> About Egnima's components, I don't have a precise idea except to have
> components for the documentation, packages, translations and general
> code. I have no idea if we should split further the code into other sub
> components.
well, it should be separated into features, more or less, so, for
instance, we could have:

SQL editor

although I don't know if it's worthy having too many components. Any
comments anyone?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]