Re: Antw: Re: revised gda-xml-query.dtd
- From: Vivien Malerba <malerba linuxave net>
- To: "Gerhard Dieringer" <DieringG eba-haus de>
- Cc: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Antw: Re: revised gda-xml-query.dtd
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:50:04 +0200
On mer, 26 jui 2000, you wrote:
> Hi Vivien,
>
> you wrote:
>
> > > This implies, that the query element should be changed to
> > >
> > > <!ELEMENT query (select|insert|update|delete|create|drop)>
> > > <!ATTLIST query
> > > id NMTOKEN #IMPLIED>
> > >
> > > and these new elements have to be defined.
> >
> > Yes, that would mainly solve the problem we talked about, and it will be easier
> > to know what can and cannot appear and where. That is the right way to proceed.
>
> I'm glad that you like it, but this means, that your gda-xml-query.c has to be totally rewritten.
>
Yes, but I knew that! It was just to demonstrate what could be done. Let's now
stabilize the DTDs before rewritting it.
>
> > Ok, it looks better than what I proposed, so let's go with it, but let's
> > replace
> > <!ATTLIST type
> > name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED
> > size NMTOKENS #REQUIRED>
> > by
> > <!ATTLIST type
> > name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED
> > size NMTOKENS #IMPLIED>
> > because not all data types need to give a size (like 'cidr' under postgres for
> > IP adresses)
>
> I wasn't sure if we require the size, but you are right. If the type has no variants, the size would be redundant.
>
Ok.
>
> > > This scheme allows the construction of at least the same data types as the C langage.
> > >
> > >
> > > As the C-structs are extended to classes in C++ we could also extend this scheme to support OO.
> > >
> >
> > What do you have in mind?
>
> It's not matured now, but when I'm able to put it into some DTD elements, I will send you a proposal.
>
Ok.
>
> > What would be nice is to make a new version of the DTD from all we have
> > discussed so far. As I leave my current work here in Paris at the end of the
> > week, I'm quite busy. I'll probably be also busy next week when I start my new
> > job in Toulouse, so if you don't want to do it, I'll do it after next week.
>
> It's almost ready :-). I also made some test-docs to check the syntax. I will send it all to you and the gnome-db-list during this week.
>
Nice! You are less lazy than I am!
Vivien
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]