Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo linuxave net>]

> > Hi,
> > 
> > It's became clear to me that due to university duties, I will be unable to
> > start working on Bonobo-- and keep on working with MonkeyBeans. This means
> > two things: first, I will have to choose one to work on. Second, some help
> > would come very handy. Please read these two short descriptions of both.
> > (please note that `Bonobo' means `the Bonobo infrastructure' and
> > `GNOME Bonobo implementaton' means `the C implmenentation
> > and the GtkObject-based API')
> 
> Hmm, doesn't anyone have any reponses to this?  Cactus is wulling to spend
> his time wrapping bonobo for use with gtk-- if he can find a certain
> level of support as in fellow interested developers, bug testers and
> users.   If you don't want him to spend his time else where we
> need to give it a good response with some messages on the mailing list.
> 
> This has not been the first time a developer has proposed something
> written a first version and no one has seemed to notice, but we need to
> do better than that or gtk-- will be a stand alone library forever.  
> 
> Can we at least get 5 messages on the list to say "Yes, this interests
> me I am willing to discuss it on some mailing list"  or "No, Cactus
> you better just keep working on MonkeyBeans" ?
> 
ok, here it's mine: I'd love to see both projects done, but if I've got
to choose, I would prefer bonobo--, since it seems there are more people
using C++ than Java.

cheers