Re: Namespacing issues ...
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael helixcode com>
- Cc: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>, Darin Adler <darin eazel com>, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo linuxave net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, George Lebl <jirka 5z com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Namespacing issues ...
- Date: 17 Nov 2000 22:12:09 +0100
Michael Meeks <michael helixcode com> writes:
> > I don't want to start another flameware here, but this looks like you
> > now want to get studlyCapsification everywhere in GNOME through the
> > backdoor ..... ?
>
> I don't want studlycapsification 'everywhere in GNOME' I want the
> same naming convention to be used across all of our _Idl_. I dislike
> stdlycaps in normal C method names [ as previously discussed ad nauseum ],
> but consistancy across the component model is important. This was just
> pointing out that if you are doing a load of IDL related perl scripting
> anyway; now might be a good time =)
That's exactly what I feared during this whole studlyCaps debate - that we'll
now get IDL renamings _all over GNOME_ through the back door.
I hate studlyCaps even in IDL and I never thought that there'll ever by
studlyCapsed IDL in any baulig-maintained code - but Dude, that's exactly what
you have reached now - consistancy with the rest of our IDL is much more
important for me than my personal dislikings
/me does the we-are-all-monkeys dance, turns the volume control of his CD
player to 100% and starts to studlyCaps his IDL ....
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]