Re: Size negotiation...
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Michael Meeks <mmeeks gnu org>
- Cc: Mathieu Lacage <lacage email enst fr>,gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Size negotiation...
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 19:02:24 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > In the meantime, waiting for such a system to be implemented, my feeling
> > is that we should implement the current interfaces. I understand your
> > reasons but my feeling is that having something relying on GTK in Bonobo
> > implementation is just plain evil.
>
> The Object system ?
Only the GNOME Bonobo implementation uses GtkObjects, as a way to make the
mapping of CORBA objects to C easier to use.
BTW, someone once mentioned a project to make an idl compiler that creates
abstract GtkObjects for the interfaces, and writing an implementation is
as easy as sub-classing them. What's the status of that nifty idea?
--
.--= ULLA! =----------------------------. finger cactus@cactus.rulez.org
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ for PGP public key
`----------= cactus@cactus.rulez.org =--'
Assassination is the extreme form of censorship.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]