Re: Size negotiation...
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <mmeeks gnu org>,Mathieu Lacage <lacage email enst fr>,gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Size negotiation...
- Date: 29 May 2000 14:01:57 -0700
ERDI Gergo <cactus@cactus.rulez.org> writes:
> On Mon, 29 May 2000, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> > > In the meantime, waiting for such a system to be implemented, my feeling
> > > is that we should implement the current interfaces. I understand your
> > > reasons but my feeling is that having something relying on GTK in Bonobo
> > > implementation is just plain evil.
> >
> > The Object system ?
>
> Only the GNOME Bonobo implementation uses GtkObjects, as a way to make the
> mapping of CORBA objects to C easier to use.
>
> BTW, someone once mentioned a project to make an idl compiler that creates
> abstract GtkObjects for the interfaces, and writing an implementation is
> as easy as sub-classing them. What's the status of that nifty idea?
>
I'll post a proposed IDL mapping soon.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]