Re: lsr-0.3.0 and speech-dispatcher

["Peter Parente" <parente gmail com>]

Hi Tomas,

I apologize for the offense caused by the poor grammar and vagueness
of my message. I wasn't suggesting that the bug was in Speech
Dispatcher, but in the LSR module that interfaces with Speech
Dispatcher (which is exactly where the bug existed). I didn't even
realize it until now, but the word "support" is missing from my
original message. It should have read:

"Thanks for trying speech dispatcher with LSR. The module is pretty
rough around the edges since Speech Dispatcher support is still under heavy
development. You've likely encountered a bug."

What a difference a word makes!

Again, my apologies to the Speech Dispatcher project and the users on
the mailing list for any confusion I might have caused. Please keep up
the good work on Speech Dispatcher.

Regards,
Pete

On 10/11/06, Tomas Cerha <cerha brailcom org> wrote:
> Peter Parente napsal(a):
> > Thanks for trying speech dispatcher with LSR. The module is pretty
> > rough around the edges since Speech Dispatcher is still under heavy
> > development. You've likely encountered a bug.
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> I have to object strongly.  I don't think it was your intention, but
> please consider, that you may hurt other project by such a proclamation.
>
> Speech Dispatcher is not under heavy development for quite some time
> now.  What was under development lately is just the Python interface
> library, but even there we were keeping the backwards compatibility very
> strictly.
>
> We're definitely open to discuss any (even potential) problems in our
> software and we never pretended it is perfect, but I think one should be
>  very carefull when making judgments about other peoples work in public.
>
> I'm sorry I had to say that.  Anyway, I wish you a good luck with the
> LSR project.  To me it seems technologically very promising.
>
> Best regards, Tomas.