Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 2)

[Mario Sanchez Prada <mario prada samsung com>]

> [...]
> So, taking into account that you are already working on this, I assume
> that you would prefer to add the generic boundary now, in order to
> avoid two updates of the implementation of those APIs. Right?

It's not that I prefer to do that now in order to avoid two updates of the
implementation of those APIs, but just because I think it's clearer and less
confusing from the POV of the new API.

Furthermore, I also think it should not be a big deal to have those new
boundaries co-exist with the old ones as long as it's clearly stated in the
documentation what is deprecated and what is not. Or you can use some kind
of aliases like what Trevor is suggesting.

Thanks,
Mario