Re: [g-a-devel] At-spi over dbus performance.

[Mike Gorse <mgorse alum wpi edu>]

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Piñeiro wrote:

> I think that I already made that question on a weekly meeting, but
> just for the record. This work to move most of the current bindings to
> C could be used to have a full C-SPI bindings? Or they will be just
> the enough code to improve the performance?

It will be a full AT-SPI binding but will not be API-compatible with the 
original cspi.  I am trying to have it work well with GObject 
introspection (returning errors in a GError, using standard GObject 
reference counting, etc).  It should be possible for someone to write a 
thin layer over it to provide compatibility with cspi, although I am not 
planning on doing this--it might make more sense anyhow for someone 
wanting to use C to port to the new API, since there aren't that many 
projects using CSPI anyhow.

-Mike