Re: [g-a-devel] AT-SPI D-Bus investigation
- From: Li Yuan <Li Yuan Sun COM>
- To: Steve Lee <steve fullmeasure co uk>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org, Mark Doffman <mark doffman codethink co uk>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] AT-SPI D-Bus investigation
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:53:48 +0800
>From the results of cspi, you can see what at-spi-registryd functions
are called by cspi. I mean you can get almost the same results by
listening cspi or listening at-spi-registryd.
And we haven't deprecated cspi yet, although it is our wish.
Li
On 五, 2007-11-23 at 10:18 +0000, Steve Lee wrote:
> I'm wondering how useful the results for cspi are seeing that it has
> been declared obsolete AFAIK? Does the fact that it ends up calling
> at-spi outweigh any possible differences in the way it works?
>
> Steve Lee
>
> On 23/11/2007, Li Yuan <Li Yuan sun com> wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > We have about 35 gok test cases. And I can write a D-trace script to
> > count function calls in cspi or at-spi-registryd. But you need to have
> > an OpenSolaris box to run D-trace script. :-)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Li
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 16:58 +0000, Mark Doffman wrote:
> > > I intend to continue with some more performance testing, for the
> > > moment
> > > I would like to profile the use of the AT-SPI interface made by GOK.
> > > Does anyone know of some GOK tests that will give a good idea of the
> > > calls made during normal use?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
> >
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]