Re: [g-a-devel]Implementing support for state sets in at-spi



Michael said:

>	Sounds like a good enough idea.
>
>+	Any getPackedData ();
>
>	Ultimately I don't believe that exposing the getData method as:
>
>+	sequence<StateType> getData ()
>
>	would hurt the API whatsoever, and would quite possibly help other
>people make the optimizations necessary in some cases. I don't see how
>that would make the API any less opaque than it is already.


OK; 

Since Marc is implementing this I think he should make the call.

Marc, could you email the release team about this?

Thanks

Bill

>	Regards,
>
>		Michael.

------
Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]