Re: [g-a-devel]grabFocus ...

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

Hi Bill,

On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 15:51, Bill Haneman wrote:
> It depends on the AT's own processing model, doesn't it?  If the AT does
> its own internal event queueing, it might not act on the new events
> until it's returned from the doAction call.

	Yes fair enough, if it's queuing things until idle.

> It's certainly something the AT developers will need to be aware of, if
> for some reason we don't change the existing "block until action
> complete" behavior.

	Yes; indeed. Delaying the actual action until idle on the incoming
CORBA call is probably a good idea for incoming re-enterancy reasons
alone.

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot