Re: [g-a-devel]grabFocus ...

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 12:05, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Actually this is a problem for AT also, since without threading its own
> event loop (which I don't think is currently safe), the AT won't receive
> events from the dialog.

	All incoming at-spi events will be processed just fine, since they will
re-enter during the scope of the outbound CORBA call.

> So another reason for not using new API is that the existing API won't
> be useful unless it's changed to behave 'asynchronously' with respect to
> the action invocation.

	Hmm; interesting.

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot