Re: global proxy settings
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- To: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
- Cc: Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: global proxy settings
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:19:45 -0800
On 19Dec2001 05:03PM (-0500), Joe Shaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 16:26, Alex Graveley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 15:19, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > > Currently /system/gnome-vfs/[use-http-proxy, http-proxy-host] is being
> > > used so it's probably a good idea to stick with that.
>
> Is this a URL? For authenticated proxies, is it correct to say:
The current settings are just a boolean setting and a hostname. I
don't think it's a URL.
> http://user:password proxyhost:port
>
> ... or should we also add http-proxy-user and http-proxy-password?
The password should not be stored in GConf. The username, maybe, as a
convenience. The user should get promted for the proxy password as
needed (ideally only once per app or once per session).
> > Does
> > /system/gnome-vfs/
> > use-socks-proxy
> > socks-proxy-host
> > socks-proxy-user
> > socks-proxy-password
> >
> > work for everyone as well?
These sound fine to me (although gnome-vfs does not support them yet).
> Which takes precedence, a SOCKS proxy or an HTTP proxy? I think it
> would be better to have a "use-proxy" flag, and just use a URL, with
> "http", "socks4" or "socks5" as the protocol.
It's perfectly valid to have a setup where you use an http proxy for
http and a SOCKS proxy for all other ports.
So I think it should be valid to have both set, and to have the http
proxy take precedence, for http.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]