Re: Getting libgnome* into shape
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, George <jirka 5z com>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, gnome-2-0 <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Getting libgnome* into shape
- Date: 29 Aug 2001 18:31:41 -0400
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 17:30, Joe Shaw wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2001 14:56:18 +0100, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > Does it matter? I mean *REALLY* matter? We can all argue about this until
> > the Sun becomes a red giant, but i remain extremely unconvinced it is an
> > issue we ned to have large discussions and arguments over.
>
> Sure, it matters. An implicit dependency is nicer because what's behind
> it becomes an implementation detail. It's just like imposing the policy
> of having private structures and using an accessor API instead of
> messing with the structure directly, which we can all agree is
> beneficial: just look at gnome-libs 1.x and it's explicit dependency on
> Imlib.
ironically imlib itself hides from us the explicit dependency on libpng,
libtiff, etc.
jacob
--
"OOH!!! Look at me!! I'm Jacob Berkman! I have a witty .signature
that nobody fully appreciates but myself!!" -- Anonymous
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]