Re: libglade-1.99.1

Hi Guys,

On 24 Aug 2001, jacob berkman wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-08-24 at 08:28, James Henstridge wrote:
> >   - Port over Michael's bonobo support.  Support for bonobo (and in the
> >     future, gnomeui) is loaded dynamically, so you don't need to use a
> >     different init function.  If libbonoboui is not installed, the module
> >     won't be built.
> it would be nice if it either required bonobo or the bonobo module was
> in bonobo.
> otherwise, apps can't know if there's bonobo support in libglade,
> thereby making said support unusable.

	While libglade clearly has value outside the GNOME platform - I
think it would be by far the best if the default build was the GNOME
build, and that the default GNOME build relied on all the funky
technologies we have.

	This will stop all the whacked out package builders in various
distros from getting it wrong - and yet still allow people to have gtk
only builds.

	How does that sound James ?



 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]