Re: [glade--]Treeview no glademm

[Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>]

Susumu Yoshida schrieb:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:26:52 +0100
> Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de> wrote:
>
> > I think that treeview1->selection()->changed().connect is more 
> > appropriate. But there's no way to make glade* do that for you. Simply 
> > put that in your ctor.
>
> My code is ...
>
> window1.cc:37: treeview1->selection()->changed().connect(SigC::slot(*this, &window1::on_treeview1_selection_changed));

Sorry, dumb mistake. It's treeview1->get_selection()->signal_changed() .

> > > 2.I selected the "select_cursor_row" signal and tried to compile the code
> > >  but failed. The error message I got is shown below.
> >
> > Perhaps glademm is generating the wrong signature. Do you already use 
> > the CVS version?
>
>
> I figured out that problem last night. It was glademm's bug as you mentioned.
> It codes a function of "void" return type while it should code one of "bool"
> return type.
> I fixed that problem manually and I was able to compile successfully.
> (But "select_cursor_row" signal was not what I wanted)
>
> I am not using the CVS version yet. Is that problem already fixed 
> in the CVS version?

don't know. _You_ should be able to tell easily ;-)

   Christof

PS: The selected row is available via
 treeview1->get_selection()->get_selected()