Re: [glade--]GLade-- Question
- From: Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>
- To: VImal Parikh <vimaldude yahoo com>
- Cc: glademm-list <glademm-list gnome org>, "Pierre Bacquet" <Pierre Bacquet anite com>
- Subject: Re: [glade--]GLade-- Question
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:20:22 +0100
[Pierre: Vimal has the same problem, so I cc you]
Hi Vimal,
VImal Parikh schrieb:
Thanks for the reply. Please don't get frustrated. You have done a
I already am. Nobody cares to send in patches for gnomemm2 (I have no
use for it), I have lots of reports of autotools breakage with newer
versions (on RH9 only) and gettext seems to fail, too. Looks like a lot
of unthankful work ahead. :-(
good job with glade-- and even if I can't use it from glade, I can
still use it by itself to generate c++ files. That still is a good
thing.
But unless you either use the CVS version or mark the widgets as
<cxx_visibility>protected</> you won't be able to access the widgets
glademm creates for you.
Please keep up the good work.
Here's an answer from Damon to the same problem:
Damon Chaplin schrieb:
> On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 13:51, Pierre Bacquet wrote:
>
>>Damon,
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 13:06, Pierre Bacquet wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>I am trying Zindows version of Glade 2.0.1 and it seems
>>>>that support for other languages than C has been removed.
>>>>
>>>>Can you please tell me why ?
>>>>
>>>>Is there any quick fix / patch to re-enable it ?
>>>
>>>The C++ code generator is a separate package, glademm.
>>>See http://home.wtal.de/petig/
>>
>>I know and I've downloaded it. What I mean here is that the
>>"Project > Project Options ..." dialog box has no more the
>>"Language :" C, C++ radio buttons at the bottom as it were
>>the case for Glade 1.1.2 .
>>
>>Is there any reason for removing this feature which proved
>>quite helpful ?
>
>
> I know I haven't touched it. I even added the Ada option again for
> 2.0.1.
>
> Where did you get your Glade package from? It is possible that they
> patched Glade to take the option out. If you ask them they'll probably
> add it back.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]