Re: [glade--] Never use g++-2.95 with glademm/gtkmm2 !!!

[Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>]

Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 12:22, Christof Petig wrote:
>
> > > That seems like an over-reaction. There should be no problem if you use
> > > a default constructor.
> >
> > A default ctor for the base class IIRC.
> >
> > And in glade generated code the base class takes care of 
> > creating/configuring/adding the widgets (which is of course done in the 
> > ctor, so that you can access them in your custom class ctor).
>
>
> You mean that the glademm-generated class has no default constructor?

it has, but add() is called there. That's the problem.

> > A workaround would be to use an empty ctor and call an initialization 
> > method. But I don't plan to invest my time in this ugly hack (and its 
> > documentation) (it's better invested in using g++ 3.2).
>
>
> Well I suggest that you accept a patch if it's important enough to
> anybody.

Of course (though I would call absolutely requiring a method be called 
first in an user ctor an ugly hack). I love to totally ignore widget 
creation in user classes.

  Christof