Re: [glade--]unable to add new members to derived class
- From: Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>
- To: Bob Koutsky <bck webhome cz>
- Cc: glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [glade--]unable to add new members to derived class
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:25:40 +0100
Bob Koutsky wrote:
Hello,
Hi Bob,
this is probably something very stupid, but my C++ is little rusty
(after years of Java) and I'm completely new to gtkmm & related stuff,
so please have a patience:
I create new gtk+ project using glade - single window containing a
label, nothing else. I set the language to C++, generate code, run
autogen.sh, run the program, it works. Then I add a single member to the
main window class header file:
#ifndef _WINDOW1_HH
# include "window1_glade.hh"
# define _WINDOW1_HH
#include "glademm_support.hh"
class window1 : public window1_glade
{ public:
int foo;
};
#endif
run make, run the program, and get segmentation fault. If I try to use
DDD, it apparently fails on the "Gtk::Main m(&argc, &atgv)" line in
function main, and it reports following:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 1120)]
0x4049a82e in Glib::ObjectBase::is_derived_ () from
/usr/lib/libglibmm-2.0.so.1
My gcc is 2.95.3, glade-- is 1.1.2 and reports following when generating
code:
Found pkg-config version 0.14.0
Generating code for gtk 2.0.8 (pkg-config), gtkmm 2.0.1 (pkg-config),
[gnomemm 1.2.3 (pkg-config)]
Can somebody please tell what is the problem and how to fix it? I would
like to convert to gtkmm, but I'm starting to miss Java and Swing
already 8-)
You encountered one of the most mysterious bugs I've ever seen. Can you do:
rm *.o
make
and try it again. I can't think of anything causing this but it's a try.
If this still fails, try to send the package to me (or a full backtrace)
(please delete *.o, any executables and the like).
Clearly a "should never occur" bug.
Christof
PS: If you don't see a personal benefit from C++/gtk/gnome, don't
switch. I never switched to java since I don't see any benefits for me
(only drawbacks). But this clearly depends on your perspective.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]