[Glade-devel] Why libxml2 and not GMarkupParser?

[e98cuenc yahoo com (Joaquin Cuenca Abela)]

--- James Henstridge <james daa com au> wrote:
> On 13/01/04 04:47, Tim M�ller wrote:
>
> GMarkupParser only accepts a small subset of valid
> XML files.  Is that 
> subset good enough?  Some of the things not
> supported include:
>
>     * files in encodings other than UTF-8
>     * entities other than &gt;, &lt; and &amp;
>     * anything related to DTDs ...
>
> What limitations do other glade file consumers have?
>  What features do 
> glade file producers produce?

I don't know of a lot of glade consumers/producers. 
To my knowledge the list includes:

 * glade2
 * glade3
 * libglade
 * glade2c
 * edalg

On glade3 I would like to stick to the XML subset
readable by GMarkupParser.  edalg doesn't work well
enough to be important, and anyway it produces
GMarkupParser compliant glade files.

Cheers,


=====
Joaquin Cuenca Abela
e98cuenc at yahoo dot com

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus