Re: [Gimp-user] using darktable or rawtherapee different results

[Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop ntlworld com>]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 06:11:56PM -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 23:59 +0200, antonio montagnani wrote:
> > I am shooting in raw format. In the past I used GIMp+Ufraw, today I
> > have 
> > to use GIMP+Darktable or GIMp*Rawtherapee.Surprsie, I get different 
> > results, for example the red of Ferrari is correct in Rawtherapee,
> > while 
> > there is some violet in Darktable. Any idea what to check or I have 
> > encountered in Darktable, that (but I am not sure) was correctly 
> > operating in the past
>
> This sounds more like a darktable question than a gimp quesiton - i
> think there may be a dt forum at pixls.us or at darktable.org?
>
> However, since you're here - try checking the white balance module in
> darktable, and also switch off the base curve module, and see if that
> helps.
>
> slave liam (ankh)
Alternatively, the forked ufraw at github (but not nufraw) should
still build.  But you would then need to create png files (16-bit
for preference) from ufraw and open those in gimp.  Tiff files might
also work, but I'm wary of those (in the past, parts have not been
understood - Thousands of Incompatible File Formats).

It's sad that ufraw is no longer supported, it's a much _easier_
build than DT or RT, and I found that both of those had far too many
things to learn.

ĸen
-- 
thread 'main' panicked at 'giraffe',
/tmp/rustc-1.32.0-src/src/test/run-fail/while-panic.rs:17:13