Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP
- From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop ntlworld com>
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 01:01:32 +0100
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:57:05PM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
configure: ====================== summary =====================
configure: build GTK GUI: yes
configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
Ah. Here is where things diverge:
configure:9400: ====================== summary =====================
configure:9402: build GTK GUI: yes
configure:9404: build GIMP plug-in: no
because:
configure:5646: checking for gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0
configure:5653: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0"
Package gimpui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Apparently the configure script wants the 2.0 version of gimpui to be
at least 2.2. The version in the system is 2.0.50.
It would seem I am SOL on this one.
That sounds extremely odd - looking at mine, 0.42 followed that test
with tests for 2.4.0 and 2.9.0.
The version in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gimpui.pc should match the version
of gimp.
If you installed 2.8.22 yourself, in a non-standard prefix (that
probably also includes /usr/lib64) export the prefix at the start of
PKG_CONFIG_PATH, followed by whatever else is in PKG_CONFIG_PATH.
Retrack: I was reading what you posted, but I think the problem may
be slightly different - it says it did not find gimpui-2.0.pc at
all (package not found, rather than a failed version test).
Check what you have in PKG_CONFIG_PATH when trying to rebuild
nufraw, and of course check where your different versions of
gimpui-2.0.pc live.
ĸen
--
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
-- Candide, de Voltaire
(Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]