Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow
- From: Patrick Shanahan <paka opensuse org>
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:41:59 -0400
* labaxp <forums gimpusers com> [05-17-18 16:30]:
An interesting variable:
- My first download was from the GIMP direct download site.
- My second download of 2.10.0 was from a mirror site.
Who knows? I think cleaning out remnants of 2.8 16 and putting 2.10.0
in a
new folder did the trick.
Rick S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Strong
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 3:00 PM
To: wireless112 ; gimp-user-list gnome org
Cc: notifications gimpusers com
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow
Not to dismiss your experience, mine is different:
GIMP 2.10.0 opens in about 7~8 seconds (first opening of the day;
subsequent
openings are faster).
The "Export As" dialogue opens in 4 sec. Ram usage is about 2.07 GB,
26%.
WIN 7 64 Pro, SP 1, 8GB RAM
My initial install experience with 2.10.0 was bad. It opened *very*
slowly
and then wouldn't open at all.
- I uninstalled 2.10.0.
- I uninstalled 2.8.16 (which supposedly had been uninstalled or
overwritten).
- I installed 2.10 to **a brand new folder.**
- It runs like a charm (so far).
Might be worth a try.
Rick S.
-----Original Message-----
From: wireless112
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 9:53 PM
To: gimp-user-list gnome org
Cc: notifications gimpusers com
Subject: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow
Slow I think is too generous. I would say 486 about describes the
performance.
Win 10 64. TR 1950x, 32 GB RAM, 2 R7 370's.
We're talking a minute waiting for export dialogs to finally become
visible,
and
when they do a majority of the time they aren't on the foreground. You
have
to
go hunting.
I had 2.8 on my previous build, no problems whatsoever. My previous
build
was a
FX8350 with 24GB of RAM. Same video.
2.8 = Lamborghini Aventador SV
2.10 = Ford Pinto
That's with 8 GB more RAM, 8 more cores, and 16 additional threads.
And a
whole
bunch of additional PCIe lanes. Source material on nvm's vs platters.
I
surely
wasn't expecting this slow. I am going to reinstall 2.8 now.
At this point I am just basically saying me too. Not expecting
assistance on
a
work around, I'll try the next version when it comes out.
Also 2.10 is a RAM pig.
It is propably windows related issue and maybe hardware related as well.
I have tried gimp 2.1 on another pc (it was the first time gimp was installed on
that pc) and the performance was terrible. I dont know what to say. All these
updates and improvements are worthless if its not stable. And they should remove
this release from stable releases.
I am sure your expert evaluation of the most expensive product, gimp, will
be well received. I am sorry your currency was ill spent.
ps: are you in any way related to Mr. Edsel who also went the way of the
dodo?
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri
Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]