Re: [Gimp-user] Digikam raw files and darktable

[Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcasmar gmail com>]

And that is my intentionm not replacing the raw editoe but calling the
external one to receive the edited image

El 13 ene. 2017 5:01 PM, "cerp" <cerp eeos biz> escribió:

> Dear all,
>
> Then we would need to have a fork for RawTherapee, one for LightZone
> (which I both prefer to Darktable for RAF file editing) and so on ....
> would it not be better to have a mechanism to use the preferred editor?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Quoting Andrey Goreev <aegoreev gmail com>:
>
> I agree 100% but digikam devs have their own point of view on how the
> > program should look like and we need to respect it.
> > This is how fork projects appear. If it is not too complicated to replace
> > libraw with darktable a fork could be not a bad idea.
> > Someone will have to maintain it though, new versions of both digikam and
> > darktable come out pretty frequently.
> >
> > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> > -------- Original message --------From: Juan Jose Casafranca <
> > jjcasmar gmail com> Date: 2017-01-13  8:29 AM  (GMT-07:00) To: digiKam -
> > Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open
> > source <digikam-users kde org> Cc: gimp-user-list gnome org,
> > darktable-user <darktable-user lists darktable org> Subject: Re: Digikam
> > raw files and darktable
> > Thanks Albrecht, that's exactly my opinion and the reason I want to
> > develop this module :-)
> > 2017-01-12 15:15 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <heviiguy gmail com>:
> >
> > On 07 Jan 2017, at 09:41, Juan Jose Casafranca <jjcasmar gmail com>
> > wrote:
> > They need a way to organize
> > their library, which DK is good at, and a way to process raw files, which
> > DT is
> > good at (DK is not a good raw processor and DT is not good for library
> > management).
> > For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above statement:
> > digiKam is a brilliant program but please, let’s maintain the focus on
> > where it is brilliant rather than trying to craft it into an
> > all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware comprising relatively mediocre
> > modules just for the sake of doing so. In the FOSS realm, digikam is an
> > excellent Digital Asset Management program, darktable is, IMHO, the best
> > Raw editor and GIMP is unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly and
> > perhaps a bit arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by
> > using only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program.
> > Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all get along….