GNOME.org
 

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

* Maurizio Loreti <maurizio loreti gmail com> [07-10-14 12:58]:

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri gmail com>
wrote:


AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
there is no "element <html>!" in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no "html" appearing in
*any* xml file.



About that you are right; I got the files using a "wget
http://URL/slr-canon.xml"; and wget got all the data of the code frame.  My
fault.

HOWEVER, downloading the files correctly, GIMP and ufraw both "barf" again;
the first line reads <lensdatabase version="1"> and is not accepted: the
old files begin with a plain "<lensdatabase>".  See, when you say


err, xml = xm


you are not right: the _format_ of the xml file has changed, indeed, as I
said.  But the change now is straightforward.


That is possible, but in this case I believe not.

Why don't you edit the version line and make it what you believe
gimp/ufraw desire and try again?  You do want it to work???

And a grep for "version" of my lensfun-data-0.2.8-9.1.noarch install
reveals nill.  I believe 2.8 is the latest from sf and 2.8-9.1 is the
latest on openSUSE which I run.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan       Plainfield, Indiana, USA          @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.org    openSUSE Community Member    facebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.org        Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://linuxcounter.net
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]