Partha Bagchi <partha1b gmail com> writes:
Can you also put the jpg you shot since that tells me what you are
expecting to see?
As an aside you may want to visit Dave Coffin's page and read the FAQ
especially about gamma and linearity.
The jpg images look very much like what you see in the Darktable images
provided on the webpage.
Antonio Montagnani and Patrick Shanahan also provided feedback regarding
loading my test image into UFRaw. Thank you all for the valuable feedback.
I admit to certainly not being well versed in using UFRaw and appreciate
all
the pointers being provided.
One thing I had missed before but do see now, is a warning symbol next
to the white balance button. This does not appear for the Minolta .mrw
images but seems to always display for the Sony .arw files. When you hover
over it, it states "Cannot use camera white balance." That is why Auto is
being selected in place of "Daylight". It makes me wonder what other raw
file data is not being processed by UFRaw for these types of files? And I
wonder if there is something particularly amiss with the Ubuntu build of
UFRaw on my system? When others load the sample file, are you seeing a
better image than the one I have posted, prior to making any corrections?
When you load other types of raw images, does UFRaw display them close to
the accurate (i.e., camera) settings? If so, what version of UFRaw and
what
type of system/OS are you using?
Thanks again for all the valuable help.
Regards,
--
Jeff
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jeffery Small <jeff cjsa com> wrote:
Partha Bagchi <partha1b gmail com> writes:
Can you provide an example image to confirm this?
Sure. Let's use the clouds photo since it is a more modern Sony format
and
pretty dramatically shows the loss of information. Point your browser
here:
http://smallthoughts.com/photos/misc/GIMP/clouds.arw
and save the image. This is a 24-Mb image file taken with an Alpha a77
camera.
Thanks for looking at this. Let me know if I can provide any additional
info.
Regards,
--
Jeff
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery Small <jeff cjsa com> wrote:
Alexander Rabtchevich <alexander v rabtchevich gmx net> writes:
When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any
corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was
made
by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would
made
with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you applyin
UFRaw a
camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see the
similar
result...
It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly over
exposed,
but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data. The
original
image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture
was
shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I
shoot
RAW+JPG). In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the right
edge
of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the
picture
as
most of the image detail is already lost. When I open the same file
in
the
DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine),
the
raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked.
So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have
reported
it as such. I'm just confused that I have not heard other people
complaining
about this problem.
Regards,
--
Jeff
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list gnome org
List membership:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
--001a11c2ef8064e2f704f65119ee
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Can you provide an example image to confirm
this?<div><br>=
</div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Partha</div></div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra"><=
br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM,
Jeffery
S=
mall <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jeff cjsa com"
target=3D"_blan=
k">jeff cjsa com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Alexander Rabtchevich <<a
href=3D"mailto:=
alexander v rabtchevich gmx net">alexander v rabtchevich gmx net
</a>>
wr=
ites:<br>
<br>
>When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying
any<br=
>corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was
made=
<br>
>by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would
mad=
e<br>
>with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you applyin
UFRaw
a=
<br>
>camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see the
similar=
<br>
>result...<br>
<br>
It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly over
expo=
sed,<br>
but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data. =A0The
original<=
br>
image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture
was<b=
r>
shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I
shoot<=
br>
RAW+JPG). =A0In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the right
edge<=
br>
of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the picture
as<=
br>
most of the image detail is already lost. =A0When I open the same file
in
t=
he<br>
DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine),
the<br=
raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked.<br>
<br>
So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have
reported=
<br>
it as such. =A0I'm just confused that I have not heard other people
com=
plaining<br>
about this problem.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
--<br>
Jeff<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gimp-user-list mailing list<br>
List address: =A0 =A0<a href=3D"mailto:gimp-user-list gnome org
">gimp-user-=
list gnome org</a><br>
List membership: <a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-us=
er-list" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-use=
r-list</a><br>
List archives: =A0 <a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-lis=
t" target=3D"_blank">https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c2ef8064e2f704f65119ee--
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list gnome org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
--089e01493f10fa279504f651fc6e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Can you also put the jpg you shot since that tells me
what=
you are expecting to see?=A0<div><br></div><div>As an aside you may want
t=
o visit Dave Coffin's page and read the FAQ especially about gamma
and =
linearity.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Partha</div><div><br></div></div><div=
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 5,
20=
14 at 4:11 PM, Jeffery Small <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:
jeff c=
jsa.com" target=3D"_blank">jeff cjsa com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">Partha Bagchi <<a
href=3D=
"mailto:partha1b gmail com">partha1b gmail com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
>Can you provide an example image to confirm this?<br>
<br>
</div>Sure. =A0Let's use the clouds photo since it is a more modern
Son=
y format and<br>
pretty dramatically shows the loss of information. =A0Point your browser
he=
re:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://smallthoughts.com/photos/misc/GIMP/clouds.arw"
target=3D"=
_blank">http://smallthoughts.com/photos/misc/GIMP/clouds.arw</a><br>
<br>
and save the image. =A0This is a 24-Mb image file taken with an Alpha
a77<b=
r>
camera.<br>
<br>
Thanks for looking at this. =A0Let me know if I can provide any
additional<=
br>
info.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
--<br>
Jeff<br>
<div class=3D""><br>
>On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery Small <<a href=3D"mailto:
jef=
f cjsa com">jeff cjsa com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><div><div class=3D"h5">>> Alexander Rabtchevich <<a
href=3D"=
mailto:alexander v rabtchevich gmx net">alexander v rabtchevich gmx net
</a>=
> writes:<br>
>><br>
>> >When you look at an imported image in darktable without
applyi=
ng any<br>
>> >corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview,
which=
was made<br>
>> >by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the
camera) =
would made<br>
>> >with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you
applyi=
n UFRaw a<br>
>> >camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see
th=
e similar<br>
>> >result...<br>
>><br>
>> It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is
terribly =
over exposed,<br>
>> but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data.
=A0The =
original<br>
>> image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the
pict=
ure was<br>
>> shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG
image =
(I shoot<br>
>> RAW+JPG). =A0In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the
ri=
ght edge<br>
>> of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the
pi=
cture as<br>
>> most of the image detail is already lost. =A0When I open the
same =
file in the<br>
>> DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP
machine=
), the<br>
>> raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked.<br>
>><br>
>> So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I
have=
reported<br>
>> it as such. =A0I'm just confused that I have not heard other
p=
eople<br>
>> complaining<br>
>> about this problem.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> --<br>
>> Jeff<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> gimp-user-list mailing list<br>
>> List address: =A0 =A0<a href=3D"mailto:gimp-user-list gnome org
">g=
imp-user-list gnome org</a><br>
>> List membership: <a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinf=
o/gimp-user-list" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo=
/gimp-user-list</a><br>
>> List archives: =A0 <a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp=
-user-list" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-lis=
t</a><br>
>><br>
<br>
</div></div>>--001a11c2ef8064e2f704f65119ee<br>
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=3DISO-8859-1<br>
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable<br>
<br>
><div dir=3D3D"ltr">Can you provide an example image
to =
confirm this?<div><br>=3D<br>
></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Partha</div>=
</div><div class=3D3D"gmail_extra"><=3D<br>
>br><br><div class=3D3D"gmail_quote">On Sat,
Ap=
r 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery S=3D<br>
>mall <span dir=3D3D"ltr">&lt;<a
href=3D3D"m=
ailto:<a href=3D"mailto:jeff cjsa com">jeff cjsa com</a>"
target=3D3D&=
quot;_blan=3D<br>
>k"><a href=3D"mailto:jeff cjsa com">jeff cjsa com
</a></a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><br>
><blockquote class=3D3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D3D"margin=
:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=3D<br>
>x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Alexander Rabtchevich
&lt;&l=
t;a href=3D3D"mailto:=3D<br>
><a href=3D"mailto:alexander v rabtchevich gmx net
">alexander.v.rabtchev=
ich gmx net</a>"><a href=3D"mailto:
alexander v rabtchevich gmx net"=
alexander v rabtchevich gmx net</a></a>&gt; wr=3D<br>
>ites:<br><br>
<br>
><br><br>
>&gt;When you look at an imported image in darktable without
applyin=
g any<br=3D<br>
>><br>
>&gt;corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview,
which =
was made=3D<br>
><br><br>
>&gt;by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera)
w=
ould mad=3D<br>
>e<br><br>
>&gt;with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you
applyin=
UFRaw a=3D<br>
><br><br>
>&gt;camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see
the=
similar=3D<br>
><br><br>
>&gt;result...<br><br>
><br><br>
>It&#39;s true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly
o=
ver expo=3D<br>
>sed,<br><br>
>but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data. =3DA0The
ori=
ginal<=3D<br>
>br><br>
>image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture
w=
as<b=3D<br>
>r><br>
>shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I
sh=
oot<=3D<br>
>br><br>
>RAW+JPG). =3DA0In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the
right=
edge<=3D<br>
>br><br>
>of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the
picture=
as<=3D<br>
>br><br>
>most of the image detail is already lost. =3DA0When I open the same
fil=
e in t=3D<br>
>he<br><br>
>DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine),
th=
e<br=3D<br>
>><br>
>raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked.<br><br>
><br><br>
>So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have
repo=
rted=3D<br>
><br><br>
>it as such. =3DA0I&#39;m just confused that I have not heard
other =
people com=3D<br>
>plaining<br><br>
>about this problem.<br><br>
><br><br>
>Regards,<br><br>
>--<br><br>
>Jeff<br><br>
><br><br>
>_______________________________________________<br><br>
>gimp-user-list mailing list<br><br>
>List address: =3DA0 =3DA0<a href=3D3D"mailto:<a
href=3D"mailto:=
gimp-user-list gnome org">gimp-user-list gnome org
</a>">gimp-user-=
=3D<br>
><a href=3D"mailto:list gnome org">list gnome org
</a></a><br>=
;<br>
>List membership: <a href=3D3D"<a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org=
/mailman/listinfo/gimp-us=3D" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/mail=
man/listinfo/gimp-us=3D</a><br>
>er-list" target=3D3D"_blank"><a href=3D"
https://mail.=
gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-use=3D" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnom=
e.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-use=3D</a><br>
>r-list</a><br><br>
>List archives: =3DA0 <a href=3D3D"<a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome=
.org/archives/gimp-user-lis=3D" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/ar=
chives/gimp-user-lis=3D</a><br>
>t" target=3D3D"_blank"><a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.=
org/archives/gimp-user-list" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/archi=
ves/gimp-user-list</a></a><br><br>
></blockquote></div><br></div><br>
<br>
>--001a11c2ef8064e2f704f65119ee--<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gimp-user-list mailing list<br>
List address: =A0 =A0<a href=3D"mailto:gimp-user-list gnome org
">gimp-user-=
list gnome org</a><br>
List membership: <a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-us=
er-list" target=3D"_blank">
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-use=
r-list</a><br>
List archives: =A0 <a href=3D"
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-lis=
t" target=3D"_blank">https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--089e01493f10fa279504f651fc6e--
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list gnome org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list