Re: [Gimp-user] CentOS packanges for 2.8?
- From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif shlomifish org>
- To: erroneus <forums gimpusers com>
- Cc: team gimpusers com, gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] CentOS packanges for 2.8?
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 10:26:34 +0300
Hello erroneus,
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 00:02:29 +0200
erroneus <forums gimpusers com> wrote:
I've been looking all over but there are just no CentOS (or RHEL for that matter) packages for the latest
version of GiMP. Compiling from source doesn't even seem to be a good option either as it looks as if it
will break the whole OS the way things are set up.
Why would it? Just compile using "./configure --prefix=/opt/gimp-2.8.x" (for
example) and install under a separate prefix. No need to install directly
under /usr .
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
This is no way to build an application! Applications and OSes should never be tied so closely together.
I like GiMP 2.8 for Windows a lot and would prefer to run it under CentOS as that is my main desktop OS. I
have given up on Fedora because of the unholy abomination GNOME has become.
What is a CentOS user to do? We want a stable and consistent OS and user experience without having to
reload/update everything after less than a year, and if I want to run a current version of Libre Office,
there is no trouble. I can do that. If I want a current version of Firefox, I can do that. But GiMP?
Nope!
Why would developers choose to shut us out like this?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
My Favourite FOSS - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/favourite/
<ew73> VB.NET is all of the fun of enforced privacy OO with all of the power
of BASIC. — Freenode’s #perl
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]