Re: [Gimp-user] 8 bit vs. 16 or more bit
- From: Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <unhammer fsfe org>
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] 8 bit vs. 16 or more bit
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:31:27 +0100
Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre prokoudine gmail com> writes:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
photographer moving from prosumer to professional (hopefully), I am
wondering about the quality differences between gimp and photoshop,
especially in the bit rate area.
Photoshop wins right now
But Darktable (http://darktable.sf.net/) runs on Mac, right?
1. Not the up to date version.
2. You don't get local editing.
If you're producing for screen/web at least, 8 bit vs 16 bit doesn't
matter for a static image in itself
Oh, it does matter :) It's not about viewing, it's about rounding errors.
… which happen when you're editing. By "static image" I meant when
you're just viewing ;)
-Kevin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]