Re: [Gimp-developer] Cubic Interpolation vs No Halo

[C R <cajhne gmail com>]

Cubic seems to be giving much better results now. Thanks again Øyvind!
I no longer feel it necessary to always switch to NoHalo. Thankyou thankyou
thankyou!

Much respect,
-C


On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Akkana Peck <akkana shallowsky com> wrote:

> > > On 07/05/16 15:38, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> > > > I've pushed code to GEGL master that makes the resamplers called
> > > > "linear" and "cubic" do a tiny bit more than just interpolation.
>
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> > > The more you change the default behavior of existing filters the more
> it
> > > makes the use of GIMP impossible in a setup where you build up a
> > > workflow... It's bad enough to outright drop the previously available
> > > scaling algorithm but to tinker and thus in some cases invalidate
> > > existing workflows without the user being made aware of it is
> ridiculous
> > > for a tool like the GIMP...
>
> Øyvind Kolås writes:
> > This was a fix for the 2.9 series - any releases of 2.9 thus far have
> > been development snapshots and you shouldn't be establishing
> > unchangable workflows based on the behavior of development snapshots.
>
> As someone who down-scales a lot (and who expects workflow and
> defaults to change now and then when using development releases), I
> want to thank Øyvind for the new code. Downscaling with Cubic looks
> much better now (compared to the previous 2.9 behavior), and is much
> faster than LoHalo/NoHalo. Good stuff!
>
>         ...Akkana
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-developer-list gnome org
> List membership:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list