Re: [Gimp-developer] Cubic Interpolation vs No Halo
- From: Nicolas Robidoux <nicolas robidoux gmail com>
- To: gimp-developer <gimp-developer-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Cubic Interpolation vs No Halo
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:24:33 -0400
I suspect that it would make very little difference when downsampling, but
maybe sigmoidization, as used in LoHalo, is not worth the computational
cost.
Very easy to modify the code:
Remove the extended_sigmoidal and inverse_sigmoidal function definitions,
and then replace these strings (which trigger the function calls) by
nothing throughout
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gegl/tree/gegl/buffer/gegl-sampler-lohalo.c
I also wonder if the nested ifs in the downsampling component should be
replaced by non-nested branches (that contain the previous tests, but are
not nested).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]