Re: [Gimp-developer] Update and apology

[wanderer <freewanderer rocketmail com>]

Yes, you got a point... I usually work with small files, but here and 
then I find myself with large files too. Having them to auto-save could 
be really time-wasting. But I got happy with these Gegl tree 
capabilities, already got excited to see it done :)

Em 25-07-2012 14:06, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) escreveu:
> On 25/07/12 07:44, wanderer wrote:
> > Well, as an user who read the list it came to my mind the 
> > implementation of auto-save in Gimp. I guess you already had that 
> > discussion, but I think that a good software is the one that 
> > understand that us, mere mortals human beings, make a lot of mistakes 
> > and try in some manner to reduce the range of these mistakes.
>
> Keep in mind that it could not be as trivial as it sounds. Image files 
> processed in GIMP can be really big, and probably the penalty in 
> performance and diskspace of having constant backups is too much.
> Probably it's better to wait until GIMP gains a non-destructive 
> workflow, where storing copies of the internal GEGL tree seems more 
> feasible than duplicating large files all the time.
>
> Gez
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> gimp-developer-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list