Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison
- From: jcupitt gmail com
- Cc: gegl-developer-list <gegl-developer-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:52:29 +0000
Hello all, vips maintainer here, thank you for this interesting discussion.
On 29 January 2016 at 16:37, Daniel Rogers <daniel phasevelocity org> wrote:
A fast 8 bit pipeline is great for previews or single operation stacks, or
when accuracy is not as important for the user.
My feeling is that gegl is probably right to be float-only, the cost
is surprisingly low on modern machines. On my laptop, for that
benchmark in 8-bit I see:
$ time ./vips8.py tmp/x.tif tmp/x2.tif
real 0m0.504s
user 0m1.548s
sys 0m0.104s
If I add "cast(float)" just after the load, and "cast(uchar)" just
before the write, the whole thing runs as float and I see:
$ time ./vips8.py tmp/x.tif tmp/x2.tif
real 0m0.578s
user 0m1.768s
sys 0m0.148s
Plus float-only makes an opencl path much simpler.
As you say, this tiny benchmark is very focused on batch performance,
so fast startup / shutdown and lots of file IO. It's not what gegl is
generally used for.
John
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]