Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

Hi Sven,

I am confused.  What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way in which parallelism is not as possible?


On Jan 28, 2016 12:58 PM, "Sven Claussner" <scl gplus gmail com> wrote:

the developers of VIPS/libvips, a batch image-processing library,
have a performance and memory usage comparison on their website,
including a GEGL test. [1]
Some days ago I told John Cupitt, the maintainer there, some issues
with the reported GEGL tests.
In his answer to me John points out that GEGL is a bit odd in this
comparison, because it is the only interactive image processing library
there. He therefore suggests to remove GEGL from this list.

What do you GEGL developers think - does anybody need these results so
GEGL should reside in this comparison or would it be OK, if John
removed it from the list?




gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gegl-developer-list gnome org
List membership:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]