Hi Sven,
I am confused. What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way in which parallelism is not as possible?
--
Daniel
Hi,
the developers of VIPS/libvips, a batch image-processing library,
have a performance and memory usage comparison on their website,
including a GEGL test. [1]
Some days ago I told John Cupitt, the maintainer there, some issues
with the reported GEGL tests.
In his answer to me John points out that GEGL is a bit odd in this
comparison, because it is the only interactive image processing library
there. He therefore suggests to remove GEGL from this list.
What do you GEGL developers think - does anybody need these results so
GEGL should reside in this comparison or would it be OK, if John
removed it from the list?
Greetings
Sven
[1]
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php?title=Speed_and_Memory_Use
_______________________________________________
gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address: gegl-developer-list gnome org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list