Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison



Hi Sven,

I am confused.  What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way in which parallelism is not as possible?

--
Daniel

On Jan 28, 2016 12:58 PM, "Sven Claussner" <scl gplus gmail com> wrote:
Hi,

the developers of VIPS/libvips, a batch image-processing library,
have a performance and memory usage comparison on their website,
including a GEGL test. [1]
Some days ago I told John Cupitt, the maintainer there, some issues
with the reported GEGL tests.
In his answer to me John points out that GEGL is a bit odd in this
comparison, because it is the only interactive image processing library
there. He therefore suggests to remove GEGL from this list.

What do you GEGL developers think - does anybody need these results so
GEGL should reside in this comparison or would it be OK, if John
removed it from the list?

Greetings

Sven

[1]
http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php?title=Speed_and_Memory_Use


_______________________________________________
gegl-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gegl-developer-list gnome org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]